article Open Access (diamond) ES 2000-01-01

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS

Peter Ashworth

Estudios pedagógicos, Issue 26 (2000)

DOI: 10.4067/s0718-07052000000100007

Abstract

"For a number of reasons qualitative techniques are especially appropriate _maybe uniquely appropriate_ to the study of student experience and other aspects of teaching and learning in Higher Education. But the nature of the data which are produced by qualitative research, the way such data must be handled, and the use to which such data can be put, are all rather readily open to confusion and misunderstanding. Confusion often lies in the failure to differentiate among several orientations to qualitative data. (i) Positivist research presupposes that there is some underlying, true, unequivocal reality, and a theory covering this is to be sought by the research. There must be evidence of validity _in the sense of a match between the data and the reality they are supposed to reveal. Non-positivist research is of a number of kinds, despite often being treated as unified. Examples are (a) descriptive (`phenomenological') research; (b) interpretative (`hermeneutic') research, and (c) discourse analysis. In this workshop, the varieties of qualitative research will be exemplified (rather than described in technical detail) using examples from our recent work on cheating and plagiarism¹. And there will be participation throughout."

Topics

Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 0.98

Field: Social Sciences · Subfield: Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

Positivism,Qualitative research,Epistemology,Confusion,Educational research,Qualitative property,Cheating,Psychology,Sociology,Mathematics education

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  • Quality Education (0.63)

All Available Versions

  • Landing page — Estudios pedagógicos publishedVersion cc-by
  • Landing page — Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) submittedVersion

Citations by Year

2026202520242023202220212020201920182017
1131101716131413

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google