article Open Access (gold) EN 2025-02-15

Anthropometric and physical indicators among Jordanian female soccer according to playing position

Abstract

Introduction: Soccer requires specific indicators to help achieve athletic accomplishments, including anthropometric measurements linked to physiological capacities and significantly influencing fitness levels. Objective: This study aimed to explore the anthropometric and physical measurement values among Jordanian female soccer players and to identify differences in these values according to playing position. Methodology: Thirty-two players on the Jordanian women's national soccer team participated in this study. The age, height, and body mass of the participants (mean ± SD) were 21.5 ± 4.1 years, 163.8 ± 6.8 cm, and 56.02 ± 6.7 kg, respectively, were assessed during the competitive (2022-2023) seasons. The study's goals were accomplished by applying means, standard deviations, and One-Way ANOVA analysis to examine the impact of playing position on the dependent variables. Results: The study findings revealed that the average skinfold thickness was (70.28± 3.89) mm, while the midfield players were the tallest compared to other playing positions (1.66± 0.06) m. They also achieved the best time in the Zig Zag test (21± 1.63)s. On the other hand, the forwards achieved the highest level of kicking accuracy and the 30-meter sprint tests (4.68± 0.41) and (31.21±1.67)s, respectively. The results showed a positive correlation between the body mass index and the results in the Illinois test (0.37). Discussion: These findings are primarily aligned with the results of previous studies. Conclusions: Based on the study results, future studies that increase the sample size and include other anthropometric tests and measurements can be conducted.

Topics

Sports Performance and Training 0.95

Field: Medicine · Subfield: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Keywords

Anthropometry,Psychology,Position (finance),Geography,Business

All Available Versions

Citations by Year

2026
86

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google