Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation
Simon C. Lovell, Ian Davis, W.B. Arendall, Paul I. W. de Bakker, J. Michael Word, Michael G. Prisant, Jane S. Richardson, David Richardson
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 437–450 (2003)
10.1002/prot.10286
PMID: 12557186
Abstract
Geometrical validation around the Calpha is described, with a new Cbeta measure and updated Ramachandran plot. Deviation of the observed Cbeta atom from ideal position provides a single measure encapsulating the major structure-validation information contained in bond angle distortions. Cbeta deviation is sensitive to incompatibilities between sidechain and backbone caused by misfit conformations or inappropriate refinement restraints. A new phi,psi plot using density-dependent smoothing for 81,234 non-Gly, non-Pro, and non-prePro residues with B < 30 from 500 high-resolution proteins shows sharp boundaries at critical edges and clear delineation between large empty areas and regions that are allowed but disfavored. One such region is the gamma-turn conformation near +75 degrees,-60 degrees, counted as forbidden by common structure-validation programs; however, it occurs in well-ordered parts of good structures, it is overrepresented near functional sites, and strain is partly compensated by the gamma-turn H-bond. Favored and allowed phi,psi regions are also defined for Pro, pre-Pro, and Gly (important because Gly phi,psi angles are more permissive but less accurately determined). Details of these accurate empirical distributions are poorly predicted by previous theoretical calculations, including a region left of alpha-helix, which rates as favorable in energy yet rarely occurs. A proposed factor explaining this discrepancy is that crowding of the two-peptide NHs permits donating only a single H-bond. New calculations by Hu et al. [Proteins 2002 (this issue)] for Ala and Gly dipeptides, using mixed quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics, fit our nonrepetitive data in excellent detail. To run our geometrical evaluations on a user-uploaded file, see MOLPROBITY (http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu) or RAMPAGE (http://www-cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/rampage).
Topics
Field: Materials Science · Subfield: Materials Chemistry
Keywords
Ramachandran plot,Measure (data warehouse),Plot (graphics),Position (finance),Crystallography,Turn (biochemistry),Smoothing,Molecular geometry,Resolution (logic),Geometry
MeSH Terms
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Affordable and clean energy (0.47)
All Available Versions
- Landing page — Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics publishedVersion
- Landing page — PubMed publishedVersion
- Landing page — Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) submittedVersion
Citations by Year
| 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | 147 | 181 | 179 | 223 | 294 | 368 | 364 | 349 | 285 |
- Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters 2006 · 7170
- Improved side‐chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field 2010 · 6425
- Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons 1991 · 5258
- Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation 2003 · 4651
- Essential dynamics of proteins 1993 · 3540
Continue on JournalsHub
Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.