article Closed Access EN 2019-01-01

Cosmological constraints from the Hubble diagram of quasars at high redshifts

G. Risaliti, Elisabeta Lusso

Florence Research (University of Florence) (2019)

DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0657-z

Abstract

The concordance model (Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) model, where Lambda is the cosmological constant) reproduces the main current cosmological observations(1-4) assuming the validity of general relativity at all scales and epochs and the presence of CDM and of Lambda, equivalent to dark energy with a constant density in space and time. However, the Lambda CDM model is poorly tested in the redshift interval between the farthest observed type Ia supernovae(5) and the cosmic microwave background. We present measurements of the expansion rate of the Universe based on a Hubble diagram of quasars. Quasars are the most luminous persistent sources in the Universe, observed up to redshifts of z approximate to 7.5 (refs. (6,7)). We estimate their distances following a method developed by our group(8-10), based on the X-ray and ultraviolet emission of the quasars. The distance modulus/redshift relation of quasars at z < 1.4 is in agreement with that of supernovae and with the concordance model. However, a deviation from the Lambda CDM model emerges at higher redshift, with a statistical significance of similar to 4 sigma. If an evolution of the dark energy equation of state is allowed, the data suggest dark energy density increasing with time.

Topics

Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 1.00 Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 1.00 Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 1.00

Field: Physics and Astronomy · Subfield: Astronomy and Astrophysics

Keywords

Physics,Quasar,Dark energy,Astrophysics,Redshift,Hubble's law,Cosmic microwave background,Cosmology,Cold dark matter,Cosmological constant

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  • Affordable and clean energy (0.59)

Citations by Year

20262025202420232022202120202019
1129656372655724

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google