article Open Access (gold) EN 2018-03-12

Global Carbon Budget 2017

Corinne Le Quéré, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Stephen Sitch, Julia Pongratz, Andrew C. Manning, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Glen P. Peters, Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, Thomas A. Boden, Pieter P. Tans, Oliver Andrews, Vivek K. Arora, Dorothée C. E. Bakker, Leticia Barbero, Meike Becker, Richard Betts, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise Chini, Philippe Ciais, Catherine E Cosca, Jessica Cross, Kim Currie, Thomas Gasser, Ian Harris, Judith Hauck, Vanessa Haverd, R. A. Houghton, Christopher W Hunt, G. C. Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Markus Kautz, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Ivan D. Lima, Danica Lombardozzi, Nicolas Metzl, Frank J. Millero, Pedro M. S. Monteiro, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin‐Ichiro Nakaoka, Yukihiro Nojiri, X. A. Padín, Anna Peregon, Benjamin Pfeil, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Janet J. Reimer, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Benjamin D. Stocker, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco N. Tubiello, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Guido R. van der Werf, Steven van Heuven, Nicolas Viovy, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Andrew Watson, A. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle, Dan Zhu

Earth system science data, Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 405–448 (2018)

University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Tyndall Centre, CICERO Center for International Climate Research, University of Exeter, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Forest Institute, Stanford University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Environment and Climate Change Canada, University of Miami, NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, Met Office, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, University of Maryland, College Park, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Woodwell Climate Research Center, University of New Hampshire, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Institute of Applied Energy, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Laboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches Numériques, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, University of Tasmania, Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Bern, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, Centre for High Performance Computing, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Instituto de Investigacións Mariñas, Goddard Space Flight Center, Montana State University, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, University of Delaware, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Uni Research (Norway), Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France, Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications, Auburn University, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Wageningen University & Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, University of Groningen
DOI: 10.5194/essd-10-405-2018

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the global carbon budget – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-cover change data and bookkeeping models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2007–2016), EFF was 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, ELUC 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, GATM 4.7 ± 0.1 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN 2.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.6 GtC yr−1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For year 2016 alone, the growth in EFF was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1. Also for 2016, ELUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, GATM was 6.1 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND was 2.7 ± 1.0 GtC yr−1, with a small BIM of −0.3 GtC. GATM continued to be higher in 2016 compared to the past decade (2007–2016), reflecting in part the high fossil emissions and the small SLAND consistent with El Niño conditions. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 402.8 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2016. For 2017, preliminary data for the first 6–9 months indicate a renewed growth in EFF of +2.0 % (range of 0.8 to 3.0 %) based on national emissions projections for China, USA, and India, and projections of gross domestic product (GDP) corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017 (GCP, 2017).

Topics

Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 1.00 Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols 0.99 Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies 0.99

Field: Environmental Science · Subfield: Global and Planetary Change

Keywords

Biosphere,Environmental science,Carbon cycle,Greenhouse gas,Carbon sink,Climate change,Climatology,Atmospheric sciences,Deforestation (computer science),Global change

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  • Climate action (0.60)

All Available Versions

  • PDF Landing page — Earth system science data publishedVersion cc-by
  • Landing page — VU Research Portal publishedVersion other-oa
  • PDF Landing page — OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) submittedVersion
  • PDF — IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) submittedVersion
  • PDF Landing page — University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) submittedVersion cc-by
  • Landing page — Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) submittedVersion

Citations by Year

2026202520242023202220212020201920182017
225459871181721992831573
101.08
FWCI
100%
Normalized Pctile
146
References
77
Authors

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google