article Open Access (bronze) EN 2007-02-01

Ideologised values for British accents1

Nikolas Coupland, Hywel Bishop

Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 74–93 (2007)

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00311.x

Abstract

We report quantitative results from a large online survey of 5010 U.K. informants' reactions to 34 different accents of English, based on simple accent labels. Patterns of accent evaluation, in terms of adjudged levels of prestige, social attractiveness and some other variables, in many regards confirm broad findings from earlier research. Accent‐types associated with ‘standard’ speech are, for example, strongly favoured in the prestige and attractiveness dimensions. Several urban U.K. vernaculars, but not all, are systematically downgraded. On the other hand, robust differences emerge which have not been strongly evidenced previously – particularly differences according to informant gender (with females regularly producing more favourable evaluations) and region (with informants often favouring their own and linked varieties). There are also some important effects by informant age, for example with younger informants attributing less prestige to ‘standard’ accents. We interpret the findings as indicating rather persistent U.K. language‐ideologies around accent difference that are being reconstituted only gradually and in specific regards.

Topics

Linguistic Variation and Morphology 1.00 Phonetics and Phonology Research 1.00 Multilingual Education and Policy 1.00

Field: Social Sciences · Subfield: Linguistics and Language

Keywords

Prestige,Stress (linguistics),Attractiveness,Linguistics,Psychology,Ideology,Physical attractiveness,Social psychology,Sociology,Political science

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  • Quality Education (0.61)

All Available Versions

  • PDF Landing page — Journal of Sociolinguistics publishedVersion
  • PDF Landing page — Repositorio Institucional UCA (Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina) submittedVersion cc-by-nc-sa

Citations by Year

2026202520242023202220212020201920182017
8281818232920162239
37.95
FWCI
100%
Normalized Pctile
16
References
2
Authors

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google