article Closed Access EN 2012-11-23

How phonetic features project more talk

John Local, Gareth Walker

Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Vol. 42, Issue 3, pp. 255–280 (2012)

DOI: 10.1017/s0025100312000187

Abstract

Investigations into the management of turn-taking have typically focussed on pitch and other prosodic phenomena, particularly pitch-accents. Here, non-pitch phonetic features and their role in turn-taking are described. Through sustained phonetic and interactional analysis of a naturally occurring, 12-minute long telephone call between two adult speakers of British English, sets of talk-projecting and turn-projecting features are identified. Talk-projecting features include the avoidance of durational lengthening, articulatory anticipation, continuation of voicing, the production of talk in maximally close proximity to a preceding point of possible turn-completion, and the reduction of consonants and vowels. Turn-projecting features include the converse of each of the talk-projecting features, and two other distinct features: release of plosives at the point of possible turn-completion, and the production of audible outbreaths. We show that features of articulatory and phonatory quality and duration are relevant factors in the design and treatment of talk as talk- or turn-projective.

Topics

Phonetics and Phonology Research 1.00 Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 1.00 Linguistic Variation and Morphology 1.00

Field: Psychology · Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Keywords

Voice,Converse,Anticipation (artificial intelligence),Turn-taking,Point (geometry),Duration (music),Psychology,Linguistics,Communication,Speech recognition

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  • Quality Education (0.72)

All Available Versions

  • Landing page — Journal of the International Phonetic Association publishedVersion
  • PDF Landing page — White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) acceptedVersion
  • Landing page submittedVersion

Citations by Year

2026202520242023202220212020201920182017
22132641734479
3.59
FWCI
92%
Normalized Pctile
50
References
2
Authors

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google