review Closed Access EN 2014-06-16

Citrus fruit intake and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Sudong Liang, Gaofei Lv, Weikai Chen, Jianxin Jiang, Jingqun Wang

International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Vol. 65, Issue 7, pp. 893–898 (2014)

DOI: 10.3109/09637486.2014.917151 PMID: 24932663

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have investigated the association between citrus fruit and bladder cancer risk; however, the results are inconsistent. To assess these issues, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available studies. We identified relevant articles by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. We calculated the summary relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using a random effect model. We included eight case-control studies and six cohort studies in the meta-analysis. There was a significant inverse association between citrus fruit intake and bladder cancer risk in all pooled studies (RR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94) and case-control studies (RR: 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92), but not in the cohort studies (RR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.07). Our results suggest that citrus fruit intake is related to decreased bladder cancer risk. Subsequent well-designed, large prospective studies are needed to obtain better understanding of this relationship.

Topics

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 0.97 Potato Plant Research 0.94 Nuts composition and effects 0.93

Field: Medicine · Subfield: Surgery

Keywords

Observational study,Meta-analysis,Bladder cancer,Medicine,Citrus × sinensis,Food science,Cancer,Internal medicine,Biology,Orange (colour)

MeSH Terms

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCitrusCitrusCitrusFeeding BehaviorFeeding Behavior

UN Sustainable Development Goals

  • Good health and well-being (0.84)

All Available Versions

  • Landing page — International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition publishedVersion
  • Landing page — PubMed publishedVersion

Citations by Year

2026202420232022202120202019201820172016
1112321724
0.61
FWCI
50%
Normalized Pctile
28
References
5
Authors

Continue on JournalsHub

Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.

Comparison Shortlist
0 journals
Est. APC Budget: $0
Compare Now
Compare 0 Open → Clear
Save your viewing history
You've browsed several journals this session. Sign in to track them in one place and get weekly impact-factor updates.
Save with Google