The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: A United States nurses' study
Barbara Luke, N. Mamelle, Louis Keth, F. Munoz, John Minogue, E Papiernik, Timothy R.B. Johnson
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 173, Issue 3, pp. 849–862 (1995)
10.1016/0002-9378(95)90354-2
PMID: 7573257
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate factors associated with preterm birth among a national sample of U.S. nurses. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a case-control study of 210 nurses whose infants were delivered prematurely (< 37 weeks) (cases) and 1260 nurses whose infants were delivered at term (> or = 37 weeks) (controls). An occupational fatigue score was constructed from four sources and varied from 0 to 4. The relation between occupational activity (including hours working and fatigue score) and preterm birth was analyzed with the use of Pearson chi 2 tests, estimates of odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and multivariate logistic regression; we controlled for confounding factors. RESULTS: Factors significantly associated with preterm birth included hours worked per week (p < 0.002), per shift (p < 0.001), and while standing (p < 0.001); noise (p = 0.005); physical exertion (p = 0.01); and occupational fatigue score (p < 0.002). The adjusted odds ratios were 1.6 (p = 0.006) for hours worked per week (< or = 36 vs > 36) and 1.4 (p = 0.02) for fatigue score < 3 vs > or = 3. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth among working women may be related to hours worked per day or week and to adverse working conditions.
Topics
Field: Medicine · Subfield: Epidemiology
Keywords
Medicine,Odds ratio,Confounding,Confidence interval,Logistic regression,Odds,Multivariate analysis,Obstetrics,Demography,Internal medicine
MeSH Terms
All Available Versions
- Landing page — American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology publishedVersion cc-by-nc-nd
- Landing page — PubMed publishedVersion
Citations by Year
| 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Continue on JournalsHub
Put what you just read into practice with these free tools.